Daphne's Murmur

這是上週日 Discovery播出的影片預告
實際節目我只看不到20分鐘我就走開了
(Kyle居然有看完)
感覺內容太牽強了很多不合邏輯的地方
影片中許多考古學家也不斷的說
考古學並非100%確定的
我們的感覺就是
就是不信主的人試圖想引導你往
耶穌不是神沒有復活的方向想
之前牧師有針對這個影片講道
以下英文部分是牧師講道的重點筆記
中文是我自己的想法
1.Recognize how the public is brought to a new awareness but not new
informaiton, in this case, the Tomb discovery.
事實上,這個墳墓早在1980年被發現,現在發表這個影片是為了什麼緣故呢?
其心可議.
2.Mary, Joseph, Matthew....these are common names during the first
centuries B.C. and A.D. The ossuary of Joseph was missing.
如果用名字就要證明什麼,實在太薄弱了,因為那些名字簡直就是當時的
"菜市場"名.
3.Under serunity by biblical schalors and archacologists, the two producers
emphatically said they are filmmakers and not archacologists.
影片中的考古學家也提出很多不同的解釋,並非100%的確定這是耶穌的墓.
但是越模稜兩可,越容易使人跌倒.
4.New Testament writings never speak of Jesus as married, no known
association between Jesus and Matthew, and the title "Jesus, son of
Joseph" is unusual.
5.DNA analysis showed Mary and Jesus not maternally related and no
DNA available from others. Any conclusions drawn beyond that analysis
is pure speculation and conjecture.
影片中,我認為DNA鑑定是最沒有邏輯的一點論述.怎樣可以從DNA來看
兩個人有沒有結婚?而且,哪裡去找來耶穌的DNA比對.這點也太可笑了吧.
6.What is scientific evidence? Testimonial evidence is as strong, if not
stronger, than physical evidence.
聖經中有這麼多當時的見證,怎麼拿兩千年後的DNA鑑定來反駁?
7.No one knew where the body of Jesus was at the resurrection, not even
Mary. The people had one full year to locate the body of Jesus.
當時耶穌的身體不見的時候,難道會沒有人去找嗎?當時猶太人的習俗,遺體
一年後要將骨頭取出,重新安置在骨罐裡.這一整年也夠大家去找了.
耶穌復活了,當然不可能找到.這個1980年的墓更非是耶穌的.
8.Be careful not to make naive statement like "Whether the body of
Jesus is found or not, it does not matter. The Gospel is a matter of
faith and that is it".
雖然常常很多人很難接受福音,但是基督徒仍然應該用理性的態度來跟
福音朋友討論.我覺得這正是我面臨的瓶頸,因為我仍有許多不足阿.
Anyway,這個影片也是給我們一個提醒,但我想很快就會跟達文西密碼一樣
新鮮感一過就被世人所遺忘

(繼續閱讀...)

daff0408 發表在痞客邦留言(1) 人氣(308)